The U. S. Senate just voted against a constitutional
amendment to ban gay marriage. Senators Saxby Chambliss and Johnny
Isakson voted in favor of the amendment.
Senate Rejects Gay Marriage Ban
WASHINGTON, June 7, 2006
(CBS/AP) The Senate on Wednesday rejected
a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, dealing an embarrassing
defeat to President Bush and Republicans who hoped to use the measure to
energize conservative voters on Election Day.
Supporters knew they wouldn't achieve the two-thirds vote needed to
approve a constitutional amendment, but they had predicted a gain in
votes over the last time the issue came up, in 2004. Instead, they lost
one vote for the amendment in a procedural test tally that ended up
49-48.
"We were hoping to get over 50 percent, but that didn't happen today,"
said Sen. David Vitter, R-La., one of the amendment's supporters.
"Eventually, Congress is going to have to catch up to the wisdom of the
American people or the American people will change Congress for the
better."
"We're not going to stop until marriage between a man and a woman is
protected," said Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan.
While there is no chance for this constitutional amendment to move
forward, that won't stop House Republicans from holding their own debate
and vote on the measure next month, CBS News correspondent Bob Fuss
reports.
Wednesday's vote fell 11 short of the 60 required to send the matter for
an up-or-down tally in the Senate. The 2004 vote was 50-48.
Supporters lost two key "yes" votes — one from Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H.,
who has changed his mind since 2004, and another from Sen. Chuck Hagel,
R-Neb., who did not vote this time because he was traveling with Bush.
Gregg said that in 2004, he believed the Massachusetts Supreme Court
decision legalizing same-sex marriage in that state would undermine the
prerogatives of other states, like his, to prohibit such unions.
"Fortunately, such legal pandemonium has not ensued. The past two years
have shown that federalism, not more federal laws, is a viable and
preferable approach," Gregg said in a statement.
"Most Americans are not yet convinced that their elected representatives
or the judiciary are likely to expand decisively the definition of
marriage to include same-sex couples," said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., a
possible presidential candidate in 2008. He told the Senate on Tuesday
he does not support the amendment.
The tally Wednesday put the ban 18 votes short of the 67 needed for the
Senate to approve a constitutional amendment.
But the defeat is by no means the amendment's last stand, said its
supporters.
"I do not believe the sponsors are going to fall back and cry about it,"
said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah. "I think they are going to keep bringing
it up."
The defeat came despite daily appeals for passage from President Bush,
whose standing is troubled by sagging poll numbers and a dissatisfied
conservative base.
The Vatican also added muscle to the argument Tuesday, naming gay
marriage as one of the factors threatening the traditional family as
never before.
Democrats said the debate was nothing but political pandering.
"The Republican leadership is asking us to spend time writing bigotry
into the Constitution," said Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, which
legalized gay marriage in 2003. "A vote for it is a vote against civil
unions, against domestic partnership, against all other efforts for
states to treat gays and lesbians fairly under the law."
In response, Hatch fumed: "Does he really want to suggest that over half
of the United States Senate is a crew of bigots?"
Forty-five of the 50 states have acted to define traditional marriage in
ways that would ban same-sex marriage — 19 with constitutional
amendments and 26 with statutes.
The amendment would prohibit states from recognizing same-sex marriages.
To become ratified, it would need two-thirds support in the Senate and
House, and then would have to be ratified by at least 38 state
legislatures.
Seven Republicans, many from New England, voted to kill the amendment.
They were Sens. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, Susan Collins of Maine,
Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, John McCain of Arizona, Olympia Snowe of
Maine, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and John Sununu of New Hampshire.
Ben Nelson of Nebraska, the only Democratic senator who supports the
amendment, voted "yes." The only other Democrat to vote in favor of
moving forward with an up-or-down vote Wednesday, Robert Byrd of West
Virginia, opposes the amendment itself.
Three senators did not vote: Democrats Christopher Dodd of Connecticut
and John Rockefeller of West Virginia, and Republican Chuck Hagel of
Nebraska.